|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
275
|
Posted - 2015.08.06 13:54:01 -
[1] - Quote
OMG, Not enough popcorn in the world for this extravaganza
can't wait
#setsalarmclock |

Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
275
|
Posted - 2015.08.06 14:52:13 -
[2] - Quote
Does CCP have a metric on rough number of subscriptions lost due to Pheobe changes?
Pheobe and ISBoxer ban were so close, it may not be able to split those 2 out though.... |

Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
276
|
Posted - 2015.08.06 16:58:58 -
[3] - Quote
Thalen Draganos wrote:Kenneth Feld wrote:Does CCP have a metric on rough number of subscriptions lost due to Pheobe changes?
Pheobe and ISBoxer ban were so close, it may not be able to split those 2 out though.... ISBoxer wasn't banned as a whole but the keyboard and click broadcasting feature was. If I remember correctly, ISBoxer automatically disables that feature when eve is used with it. I could be wrong on that front though.
No, you are absolutely correct
So, maybe i should say ISBoxer most used feature banned, although screen management still OK
I think 99% of people know what is meant by ISBoxer ban....or maybe they don't, I dunno |

Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
276
|
Posted - 2015.08.06 20:04:38 -
[4] - Quote
Fairbanks Morse wrote:Why have you not iterated at all or taken any kind of feedback on Phoebe in the year that has passed? Allow me to quote the devblog: Quote: We are expecting to make follow-up adjustments in Rhea, in December. hahahahaahahahah Quote:The medium-term shake-out of these changes will be very impactful on sovereignty-system changes we are anticipating making next year, so we are expecting to revisit all this again as the work on those changes progresses. Yeah, right. You said you were going to iterate and consider feedback, yet you have clearly not done any such thing. Why?
side track - MOST AWESOME name ever |

Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
280
|
Posted - 2015.08.07 12:32:15 -
[5] - Quote
Andreus Ixiris wrote:Zappity wrote:Did CCP consider nerfing the Power of blobs instead of the Projection? How does one nerf the power of blobs without it being extremely arbitrary?
Blobs are powerful when no one can reasonably assemble a like force, if you could assemble a force that rivals the blob, then you can fight. Right now in order to fight a Gate camp with titans and SC, it would take 2 weeks to move to a system close enough to make it in one jump.
Gate camps typically don't last 2 weeks, or if they move gates, it takes another 2 weeks to move in range of that.....
|

Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
280
|
Posted - 2015.08.08 01:40:33 -
[6] - Quote
Aryth wrote:Are there any major technical hurdles to implementing the "tether" system? Distance from starting point so that you can move around the same region much better but harder to go far?
Some regions are grossly different sizes, if you are at the edge of a large region, you could go the other way and leapfrog 2 regions |

Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
283
|
Posted - 2015.08.10 02:39:34 -
[7] - Quote
There is ZERO difference between bridging and Jump Bridges
Same range and same exact case for power projection |

Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
285
|
Posted - 2015.08.10 11:53:12 -
[8] - Quote
Arrendis wrote:Kenneth Feld wrote:There is ZERO difference between bridging and Jump Bridges
Same range and same exact case for power projection Nonsense. Bridging can be done from within your space into enemy space. Jump Bridges require the same power to hold both ends. This is not power projection, it's domestic travel. Edit to add: What made jump bridges seem like such tools for power projection was the sheer sprawling size of empires - NA's rental space dominated the east side of the map the way the combined allianes of the CFC dominated the west side. So yes, people could use what amounted to the equivalent of continent-spanning highway systems to put the pedal down and cross vast distances. But those jump bridge networks relied on sprawling empires that can't exist anymore. You can't hold the space if you don't have the population density, and if there's an entity with enough people to maintain that population density across 50% of the conquerable systems in EVE... ... game over, man. Game over. 5 meters. That's inside the room.
I might be willing to concede to your idea, on one condition, it only applies to your alliance jump bridges
Jump bridges work by standings, so going from Deklein to Vale in a matter of a few minutes, then bridging to geminate is a bit too much power projection compared to what others have at their disposal, considering only a small portion of that is actual goon controlled space |

Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
286
|
Posted - 2015.08.10 16:56:52 -
[9] - Quote
Arrendis wrote:Kenneth Feld wrote:I might be willing to concede to your idea, on one condition, it only applies to your alliance jump bridges
Jump bridges work by standings, so going from Deklein to Vale in a matter of a few minutes, then bridging to geminate is a bit too much power projection compared to what others have at their disposal, considering only a small portion of that is actual goon controlled space Nor is any fleet doing that likely to be a 100% (or even 50%) goon fleet. So what you're really complaining about isn't jump bridges, it's politics.
Nope, that is a fleet traveling long distances with no drawback, which is power projection pure and simple.
BY your same token, jumping to beacons should accrue any fatty gay either then |
|
|
|